Separate elections are flexible but expensive. The 2014 LS elections cost 34.26 billion rupees and it will only go up. Simultaneous may reduce cost but will have challenges when there is a mid term crisis at center or state and increase other costs. However, if we move to digital elections it will reduce cost, increase speed, a larger population participation and more secure and safe elections. India was 1st in EVMs its time to go Digital. Please refer to attachment for suggestion on how.

Criminals must be barred. In order to achieve the possibility of simultaneous election, extend some assemblies and dissolve some, extend those where remaining tenure is around one to two years and dissolve those where one to two years has been completed.
let the tenure remain 5 years. this must be implemented by 2019.

I would suggest that all assemblies must go to poll together, may be after a lapse/gap of a year two of lok sabha elections. but assemblies together, regards,syngal

In the general elections and state assembly elections in the state of haryana there is no big gaps between the elections, last time general election was held in during march-April and state assembly elections was held in during September-October with assembly model code of conduct.
There is around 4 months gap between general elections and assembly elections in haryana our govt should both elections combined and save elections experience on per voter and unnecessary use of our govt machinery

Sir my view is that elections to the assemblies and Lok sabha must be held simultaneously. They were held simultaneously, but after 1972, that tradition was broken. The reason is that such a step would reduce expenses, remove horse trading, save on holidays, increase productivity. there would be a calendar of events.

another middle ground could be to hold assembly elections after a year, but all states together. the country is in election mode every year, regards syngal

एक साथ चुनाव कराने में सबसे बडी दिक्कत सरकार का बीच मे गिर जाना है इसका एक समाधान यह है कि अगर
केन्द्र स्तर पर अगर कोई सरकार गिरती है तो फिर नया चुनाव होना चाहिए और जरूरत के हिसाब से नई सरकार का कार्याकाल तय करना चाहिए। जैसे अगर कोई सरकार 3.5 वर्ष से पहले गिरती है तो नई सरकार का कार्यकाल पुरानी सरकार जितना हो तथा 3.5 वर्ष बाद अगर कोई सरकार गिरती है तो नई सरकार का कार्यकाल अगले चुनावों तक बढाया जा सकता है। लेकिन 3.5 के बाद वाले हालत में सरकार गिरने की शर्त केवल गठबंधन सरकार पर लागू हो।

Comments in PDF file which not only includes brief on simultaneous polls but also when to conduct elections and when to declare results
Thanks,
Nishit Desai- 9930003400

एक साथ चुनाव कराने में सबसे बडी दिक्कत यह है कि अगर कोई सरकार बीच मे गिर जाए तो क्या किया जाए। इसका समाधान यह है कि -
2.5 वर्ष के बाद अगर कोई सरकार गिरती है तो ऐसी स्थिति में राज्यपाल को भी शासन का अधिकार देना चाहिए। ऐसे में गठबंधन सरकार से कोई भी सहयोगी दल, राजनितिक लाभ के लिए, सहयोग वापस नहीं ले पाऐगें। लेकिन अगर 2.5 से पहले कोई सरकार गिरती है तो फिर से चुनाव हों और नई सरकार का कार्यकाल पुरानी सरकार के बराबर हो।

1.अगर हमें एक साथ चुनाव कराना है हमें सरकार के कार्यकाल के समय को लचीला करना होगा यानी जरूरत पडने पर बढाना या घटाना और कानून में बदलाव करना पडेगा यानि राज्य सरकार गिरने पर राज्यपाल को शासन देना। राज्यपाल को शासन देने बस से हो सकता है सरकार गिरे ही नहीं..
2.चुनावो में पैसो की बरबादी रोकने के लिए राजनितिक प्रचार पर भी बैन होना चाहिए और rallies की जगह, नेताओं में राष्ट्रीय,आर्थिक और सामाजिक इत्यादि विषयों पर बहस(national TV channel पर)होनी चाहिए।इससे एक लाभ यह होगा कि लोग बहस के हिसाब से वोट देगे।

RESPECTED PM SIR IT IS VERY PROUDFUL THING FOR US THAT WE HAVE SHARE SOME OF OUR THOGHTS WITH U ON DIFFERENT THING ABOUT OUR NATION FOR DEVELOPMENT. SIR FIRST I WILL SEE AS PRIMINISTER OF INDIA AT NEXT TERM FROM 2019-2024. I WISH GOD THAT MY WISH WILL COMPLETE IN NEXT ELELCTION. SIR UR FOCUS ON SIMULTANEOUS ELECTION IS VERY GREAT IT HELPS ALL INDIANS TO TAKE ONE DECISION

I have uploaded my view in PFD File.